France has been getting a lot of flak for the ban on burqas and other face veils they recently began enforcing. According to Christian Science Monitor, the law's supporters claim that the veil "oppresses Muslim women, violates the French value of gender equality, poses security concerns as it allows people to conceal weapons or hide their identity, and undermines social cohesion." Naturally, the law's opponents argue that the ban stigmatizes Muslims and promotes intolerance.
While I realize that the amount of what we call First Amendment Rights isn't the same in Europe as it is in the United States, I think that this ban is going a bit too far. To me, this is the equivalent of banning crosses worn as jewelry or "What Would Jesus Do?" paraphernalia. I was raised Ukrainian Catholic but now consider myself an agnostic, and to be honest, I really don't care what other people do with their religious or cultural iconography so long as they are not shoving it down my throat, but clearly that doesn't fly in France. I think that the French government has shown remarkable intolerance and fear by instituting this ban because even in spite of the stated purpose, the ban reads as attempt to suppress a culture that France is not comfortable with. Although articles of clothing worn in connection with religious affiliation are certainly not a new concept, ignorant and intolerant people view veils as more frightening than a set of rosary beads or a yarmulke.
What are your thoughts on the ban?
The struggle for human rights continues worldwide on a daily basis. Whether it's a struggle to prevent starvation in Africa, assert one's civil rights in the United States, or avoid torture in Latin America or Asia because of one's political opinion, these are all issues for Hate, Hope and Human Rights
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
War against Euphoria
Hate Hope and Human Rights At least that's what the addicts describe it as. In 2020 alone, an estimated 9.5 million Americans, just A...
-
The United States has consistently tiptoed around Chinese human rights issues. An American politician may occasional issue a condemnation ...
-
The UN will celebrate its 60th birthday on October 24th. But as Meg L., suggests below, not many will be celebrating. Chris B, goes a step f...
3 comments:
I agree with you that the ultimate reasoning behind the ban is intolerance. Even the stated reason that the veil "oppresses Muslim women, violates the French value of gender equality" does not make sense.
So you're going to free Muslim women from oppression by taking away one of their choices? You're going to promote equality by singling out this group and denying them the right to practice a tenant of their religion as they see fit.
Plus I've said it before and I'll say it again. Head scarves are sexy. American women really should learn to leave something to the imagination- baring it all at one time might have been empowering- in the era of the mini skirt- but now it's just tired and demeaning. Make your statement with your mind, words not your cleavage. That was my rant.
Agree with Suz.
Forcing women to remove the veil is no better than forcing women to wear the veil. It's not the veil that's the issue, it's the "Forcing women to do something because you profess to know whats better for them than they do" that's the issue.
For as progressive as France claims to be, they've certainly done one hell of a job regressing into medieval mentality.
I agree with you, and Qasim. Great Post, very well stated.
Post a Comment